Welcome to
Cooperation Commons: Interdisciplinary study of cooperation and collective action.
Welcome to NavigationRecent Summaries
|
The Cornucopia of the CommonsSummary of: The Cornucopia of the Commons
Dan Bricklin examines ways to induce a pool of users to contribute to a commons without extra effort, using the architecture of the commons (as in Napster's default to sharing in the way download directories are available) and leveraging user's self-interest. KeywordsPublication Reference
Findings
Dan Bricklin examines ways to induce a pool of users to contribute to a commons without extra effort, using the architecture of the commons (as in Napster's default to sharing in the way download directories are available) and leveraging user's self-interest. The key to understanding the success of Napster and other file-sharing technologies resides not in their 'peer-to-peer' nature but in the fact that they provide users with access to a database of desirable things and enable people to create a public good in the process of seeking their own interests. Bricklin identifies three ways to fill a database: organized manual, organized mechanical, and volunteer manual. CDDB succeeded at motivating volunteer manual data entry because it leveraged the desire for users to have their data in the database so that CDDB-aware programs could access it, for example when a user would insert a CD into their computer. Bricklin calls this "harnessing the power of individual selfishness." Napster cleverly avoided manual data entry by automatically indexing anything in the user's 'Shared Music' directory. Thus "storing the copy in the shared music directory [was] a natural by-product of the user's work with the songs." Sharing is the default. This results in users "adding to the value of the database without doing any extra work." |
Interested in participating? Visit Contact, and choose "Request to Participate". Who's new
User loginSearchWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 0 guests online.
|