Welcome to
Cooperation Commons: Interdisciplinary study of cooperation and collective action.
Welcome to NavigationRecent Summaries
|
languageEvolution of Indirect ReciprocityOne Sentence Summary: Cooperation through indirect reciprocity, captured by the phrase "I help you, someone else helps me", requires the evolution of reputations and communication of those reputations among the larger group (as in the human instinct to gossip), cognitive abilities beyond being able to identify relatives (required for kin selection) or the individuals who have cooperated with you in the past (required for direct reciprocity). Disciplines: Economics Sociology Psychology Findings:
Keywords: agent-based model altruism assurance game communication cooperation equilibrium game theory language norms prisoners dilemma public goods punishment reciprocity reputation tit-for-tat trust Published in: Nature 437, 1291-1298 Date: October 27, 2005 One Paragraph Summary: Cooperation through indirect reciprocity, can be captured by the phrase "I help you, someone else helps me". Indirect reciprocity helps explain how cooperation is possible at all when economic transactions move beyond small villages where one can easily keep track of one's interactions with everyone else. The success of strategies of indirect reciprocity in empirical studies might be attributable to the fact that humans care so deeply not only about how they are treated, but about the results of interactions between third parties. This concern and the desire to communicate concerns, or gossip, might in turn be explained by evolutionary psychology and the benefits of cooperation in large groups, surpluses resulting from division of labor. To test strategies of indirect reciprocity no two players can interact more than once and the scores of players (the portion of times they have cooperated with others) must be visible. A player choosing a simple version of indirect reciprocity will only cooperate with those whose score is above a certain threshold. However, this player might be punishing another player using indirect reciprocity who has only interacted with defectors. "Effectively, discriminating players pay a cost for punishing bad co-players. Such a form of altruistic punishment can promote cooperation in the community, but at a cost to the punisher, and thus can be viewed as a social dilemma." A more sophisticated strategy would have a player discriminate between justified defection (defecting to punish someone who always defects) and unjustified defection (defecting regardless of the recipients reputation). This strategy avoids the case where a group of players who always cooperate is invaded by a group of players who always defect, but it requires the cognitive abilities to keep track of interactions that are far removed from one's own. Beethoven's Anvil: Music in Mind and CultureOne Sentence Summary: Music may be a key driver of human biological and cultural evolution, enabling individual brains to engage in complex internal cognitive synchronization and externally attuning the brains of different individuals into group cooperative activity. Disciplines: Biology Anthropology Psychology Findings:
Keywords: communication cultural evolution emotion evolution language Published in: Perseus Books Date: 2001 One Paragraph Summary: The act of making music together, which involves language, movement, emotion, vocalization, and social interaction, may have driven the evolution of language and complex social behavior by giving humans a means of literally coupling neural circuitry through remote synchronization of oscillating neural circuits. Music, rhythm, and dance are the outward manifestations of complex neuromuscular processes that may enable cognition necessary for higher-level social activities, and provides a mechanism for coupling and synchronizing multiple nervous systems. One Page Summary: Human babies are capable of synchronizing their movements with that of others at a very early age, indicating that the neural capacity for synchrony must have occurred during gestation: "tightly synchronized interaction with others constitutes part of the maturational environment for the cerebral cortex." Our closest primate relatives can neither synchronize with others nor hold a steady beat. Ritual music and dance appear to trigger brain mechanisms that foster social bonding and so have been essential to creating the trust upon which all social interaction depends. Separate individuals who engage in mutual music-making set up neurophysiological processes that could serve as substrates for a tight coupling between multiple individuals. Protohumans, through restructuring their internal representations of each other in the process of making music behavior, may have adapted neural circuits that evolved for other purposes into social instrumentation. The neurochemical processes associated with emotions, which may play a role in the trust-building and intention-signaling behaviors essential to social cooperation, are evoked and harnessed through rhythm and music-making rituals: "We are social creatures, we depend on our fellows. When we express emotion we are signaling something about our interior milieu. We assume that others will pick up the signal and respond accordingly. Similarly, when we pick up on the emotions of another, our nervous system will bring out changes in our interior milieu." The brain's oscillatory circuits called central pattern generators can be internally synchronized through sonic activity; Benzon proposes that mutual internal synchronization, coordinated through rhythm and harmony, creates a literal inter-brain coupling which can then be adapted for complex social coordination: "Music thus becomes a means of communal play, of communal dreaming. It is a group activity in which interactions between individuals are as precisely timed and orchestrated as those within a single brain. The individuals are physically separate but temporally integrated. It is one music, one dance." Benzon proposes that physical mimicry of animal cries could have led protohumans to making music together, which later differentiated into spoken language. A survey by Alan Lomax and others of the music of 233 cultures from five continents and the Pacific islands found consistent correlations with other measures of social structure and economic practice: "…a culture's favored song style reflects and reinforces the kind of behavior essential to its main subsistence efforts and to its central and controlling social institutions." "…ritual creates a cultural space where social innovation takes place. During periods when a society is under no particular stress, ritual serves to confirm and maintain the existing order. But when the society comes under duress, ritual allows new social mechanisms to emerge. As societies grow and their structure differentiates, musicking continues to play the role it had in humankind's beginning: the forge in which new forms of social being emerge." |
Interested in participating? Visit Contact, and choose "Request to Participate". Who's new
User loginSearchWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1 guest online.
|