language

Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity

One Sentence Summary:
Cooperation through indirect reciprocity, captured by the phrase "I help you, someone else helps me", requires the evolution of reputations and communication of those reputations among the larger group (as in the human instinct to gossip), cognitive abilities beyond being able to identify relatives (required for kin selection) or the individuals who have cooperated with you in the past (required for direct reciprocity).
Disciplines:
Economics
Sociology
Psychology
Findings:
  • "The hypothesis that more information leads to more cooperation has been confirmed in experiments, which compare three information conditions. In one condition, players have no information about their co-players; in the second they are told about what their co-players have decided when last in the role of a donor; and in the third they also know about the score of the recipient of the co-player. We note that this is not always enough to decide whether a previous defection was justified or not. However, the additional knowledge did enhance cooperation."
  • "Indirect reciprocity is situated somewhere between direct reciprocity and public goods. On the one hand it is a game between two players only, the donor and the recipient, but on the other hand it has to be played within a larger group. Richard Alexander claimed that indirect reciprocity originates from direct reciprocity in the presence of interested audiences."
  • "It is easy to conceive that an organism experiences as 'good' or 'bad' anything that affects the organism's own reproductive fitness in a positive or negative sense. The step from there to judging, as 'good' or 'bad', actions between third parties, is not obvious. The same terms 'good' and 'bad' that are applied to pleasure and pain are also used for moral judgements: this linguistic quirk reveals an astonishing degree of empathy, and reflects highly developed faculties for cognition and abstraction."
  • Even a group of players with discriminating strategies can be sidetracked by imperfect transfer of reputation information, as in unfounded rumors or exaggeration: "if players have different views about the reputation of others, then errors in perception can undermine cooperation."
  • In empirical studies, discriminating players are sensitive to their own score: "players who justifiably refuse to donate to a defector show an increased tendency to provide donations in the following round, as if to make up for that refusal. This indicates that they expect their refusal to lower their score in the co-players' eyes and that they do not rely on the community's understanding."
Keywords:
agent-based model
altruism
assurance game
communication
cooperation
equilibrium
game theory
language
norms
prisoners dilemma
public goods
punishment
reciprocity
reputation
tit-for-tat
trust
Author(s) / Editor(s):
Published in:
Nature 437, 1291-1298
Date:
October 27, 2005
One Paragraph Summary:

Cooperation through indirect reciprocity, can be captured by the phrase "I help you, someone else helps me". Indirect reciprocity helps explain how cooperation is possible at all when economic transactions move beyond small villages where one can easily keep track of one's interactions with everyone else. The success of strategies of indirect reciprocity in empirical studies might be attributable to the fact that humans care so deeply not only about how they are treated, but about the results of interactions between third parties. This concern and the desire to communicate concerns, or gossip, might in turn be explained by evolutionary psychology and the benefits of cooperation in large groups, surpluses resulting from division of labor. To test strategies of indirect reciprocity no two players can interact more than once and the scores of players (the portion of times they have cooperated with others) must be visible. A player choosing a simple version of indirect reciprocity will only cooperate with those whose score is above a certain threshold. However, this player might be punishing another player using indirect reciprocity who has only interacted with defectors. "Effectively, discriminating players pay a cost for punishing bad co-players. Such a form of altruistic punishment can promote cooperation in the community, but at a cost to the punisher, and thus can be viewed as a social dilemma." A more sophisticated strategy would have a player discriminate between justified defection (defecting to punish someone who always defects) and unjustified defection (defecting regardless of the recipients reputation). This strategy avoids the case where a group of players who always cooperate is invaded by a group of players who always defect, but it requires the cognitive abilities to keep track of interactions that are far removed from one's own.

Beethoven's Anvil: Music in Mind and Culture

One Sentence Summary:
Music may be a key driver of human biological and cultural evolution, enabling individual brains to engage in complex internal cognitive synchronization and externally attuning the brains of different individuals into group cooperative activity.
Disciplines:
Biology
Anthropology
Psychology
Findings:
  • The phenomenon of synchrony observed in fireflies and other organisms may play an important role in the social coordination and trust-building behaviors that are still observed in religious and social musical and dancing rituals.
  • Working together in coordinated activity is enabled by the uniquely human use of language, and may have been key to its evolution – and music may have been a precursor to complex language behavior.
  • Making music together involves close listening and modeling of the activities of others, setting up internal neural resonances and mental models that can serve as the fundamental processes for building up more complex and instrumental social interactions.
  • Embodiment – the use of the human body as a musical instrument and for performing music with external instruments – may be an important and largely unexplored key to the evolution and maintenance of complex social behavior.
Keywords:
communication
cultural evolution
emotion
evolution
language
Author(s) / Editor(s):
Published in:
Perseus Books
Date:
2001
One Paragraph Summary:

The act of making music together, which involves language, movement, emotion, vocalization, and social interaction, may have driven the evolution of language and complex social behavior by giving humans a means of literally coupling neural circuitry through remote synchronization of oscillating neural circuits. Music, rhythm, and dance are the outward manifestations of complex neuromuscular processes that may enable cognition necessary for higher-level social activities, and provides a mechanism for coupling and synchronizing multiple nervous systems.

One Page Summary:

Human babies are capable of synchronizing their movements with that of others at a very early age, indicating that the neural capacity for synchrony must have occurred during gestation: "tightly synchronized interaction with others constitutes part of the maturational environment for the cerebral cortex." Our closest primate relatives can neither synchronize with others nor hold a steady beat. Ritual music and dance appear to trigger brain mechanisms that foster social bonding and so have been essential to creating the trust upon which all social interaction depends. Separate individuals who engage in mutual music-making set up neurophysiological processes that could serve as substrates for a tight coupling between multiple individuals.

Protohumans, through restructuring their internal representations of each other in the process of making music behavior, may have adapted neural circuits that evolved for other purposes into social instrumentation. The neurochemical processes associated with emotions, which may play a role in the trust-building and intention-signaling behaviors essential to social cooperation, are evoked and harnessed through rhythm and music-making rituals: "We are social creatures, we depend on our fellows. When we express emotion we are signaling something about our interior milieu. We assume that others will pick up the signal and respond accordingly. Similarly, when we pick up on the emotions of another, our nervous system will bring out changes in our interior milieu."

The brain's oscillatory circuits called central pattern generators can be internally synchronized through sonic activity; Benzon proposes that mutual internal synchronization, coordinated through rhythm and harmony, creates a literal inter-brain coupling which can then be adapted for complex social coordination: "Music thus becomes a means of communal play, of communal dreaming. It is a group activity in which interactions between individuals are as precisely timed and orchestrated as those within a single brain. The individuals are physically separate but temporally integrated. It is one music, one dance." Benzon proposes that physical mimicry of animal cries could have led protohumans to making music together, which later differentiated into spoken language.

A survey by Alan Lomax and others of the music of 233 cultures from five continents and the Pacific islands found consistent correlations with other measures of social structure and economic practice: "…a culture's favored song style reflects and reinforces the kind of behavior essential to its main subsistence efforts and to its central and controlling social institutions."

"…ritual creates a cultural space where social innovation takes place. During periods when a society is under no particular stress, ritual serves to confirm and maintain the existing order. But when the society comes under duress, ritual allows new social mechanisms to emerge. As societies grow and their structure differentiates, musicking continues to play the role it had in humankind's beginning: the forge in which new forms of social being emerge."

Syndicate content