ecology

Nature's Magic: Synergy In Evolution And the Fate of Humankind

One Sentence Summary:
Synergies that convey advantages drive and accelerate biological and cultural evolution by providing a package of independent elements that confer benefits many times greater than those conferred by individual elements: in biology, synergies of independently evolved traits can lead to the development of the power of flight or the emergence of humans as the dominant species; in humans, complex, coordinated activity over sustained periods leverages the power of physical tools, cultural discoveries, and social organization.
Disciplines:
Biology
Economics
Findings:
  • Synergy, "the combined or cooperative effects produced by the relationships among various forces, particles, elements, parts, or individuals in a given context – effects that are not otherwise possible," is a key driver of biological and human cultural evolution by providing immediately useful packages of benefits.
  • Certain packages of different traits, strategies, tools, norms – such as those involved with the emergence of group foraging or, much later, agriculture convey such powerful immediate survival advantages on the human groups that use them that social-cultural change happens far more quickly than it would through Darwinian evolution.
  • Human cooperation leverages synergies of tools, knowledge about the environment, social and cultural practices, to economic advantage – the payoff for cooperation for a group is high enough to overcome the individual resistance and other barriers to bringing the elements together.
  • There are at least five, perhaps more, distinct paths to cooperation and complexity in biological evolution: altruism, reciprocity, functional interdependence, mutualism, and parasitism.
Keywords:
altruism
bioeconomy
cooperation
cultural evolution
ecology
evolution
game theory
Author(s) / Editor(s):
Published in:
Cambridge University Press
Date:
2003
One Paragraph Summary:

The differential survival of packages of interdependent components, organisms, or people leads to the emergence of higher-level self-interests that transcend the interests of the parts and convey amplified benefits to the aggregation of components, from the symbiotic origins of mitochondria and chloroplasts to symbiotic microorganisms in the digestive systems of ruminants and humans, to social insects, to the evolutionary leap from tree-dwelling primates to savanna-dwelling humans. Cooperative synergies at the level of the cell, organism, species, and ecology have been central, not peripheral to the evolution of life. The evolution of human cultural traits such as social complexity, language, social foraging, the use of fire and cultural transmission of tool use and implement creation, settled agriculture, invention of technologies and symbolic communication of means for inventing technologies was both driven by synergies and necessitated new social arrangements that led to new synergies. Synergetic arrangements can be tested by removing any one element and observing whether the aggregate organism, ecology, or society can continue to exist without it.

One Page Summary:

Bacteria colonies that migrate and forage and form joint structures via chemical signaling, social insects that engage in joint problem solving behaviors via chemical signaling, symbiotic relationships between ruminants from termites to cattle with cellulose-digesting bacteria, Margulis' evidence for the symbiogenesis of mitochondria and hypthoses that flagella originated from the joining of free-swimming spirochetes with energy-producing but less-mobile microorganisms, the probably evolution of flight from a suite of synergistic functional changes, the emergence of protohumans are all cited by Corning as evidence that synergies play a central, not a peripheral role in evolution of complex life forms: "Synergy has played a key role in the progressive evolution of complex systems in nature. However, complexity is not an end in itself; it's a consequence of the innovations that produce more potent forms of synergy. Synergy is the 'driver.'"

William E. Hamilton's papers on "The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior" in 1964 formalized the neo-Darwinian explanation of altruistic behavior as conferring benefits on close kin, but Robert Trivers' 1964 "Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism" decoupled kinship, cooperation, and altruism by offering evidence that the helping organism acts with the assumption that low-cost, low-risk assistance to another now will be repaid later – reciprocity.

Game theoretic models were driven to more realistically match human and biological behavior than Axelrod's and Hamilton's models when zoologist Martin Nowak and mathematician Karl Sigmund created "Pavlov," a Prisoner's Dilemma strategy based on "win-stay, lose-shift" that introduces punishment. Corning objects to inclusive fitness theory, reciprocal altruism, tit-for-tat as adequate explanatory frameworks because they exclude interactions that provide synergistic combined effects and are self-policing because they are interdependent – the way two oarsman are interdependent when trying to cross a river if they each have one oar. Corning claims "The intellectual fascination of the Prisoner's Dilemma game may have led us to overestimate its evolutionary importance."

Rejecting single-cause "prime mover" hypotheses for either biological or cultural evolution, Corning lists "five maybe six distinct paths to cooperation and complexity in evolution:" altruism, reciprocity, functional interdependence, mutualism, and parasitism.

In regard to humans, Corning points to specific probable synergistic packages that enabled proto-humans to evolve from tree-dwelling primates, for language to evolve as an adaptation on precursors, for hunting and gathering culture to dominate and spread, for fire use to be culturally maintained, and for settled agriculture to take root and replace nomadic foraging and hunting as the dominant human form of social organization. Asking how a small, lightweight primate that can't fly or run very fast, lacking natural defensive weapons, but having bipedal gait, manipulative hands, omnivorous digestive system and large brain managed to shift to an earthbound habitat, broaden its resource base, and expand its range, Corning proposes that "In a patchy but relatively abundant woodland environment that was also replete with predators, competitors , and sometimes hostile groups of conspecifics, group foraging and collective defense/offense was the most cost-effective strategy. There were immediate payoffs (synergies) for collective action that did not have to await the plodding pace of natural selection….There may well have been group selection, but it was not based on altruism. It involved what the economists call 'collective goods' or 'public goods.'"

Corning agrees with Jared Diamond that the emergence of agricultural civilization, empires, and wars of conquest in the fertile crescent 10,000 years ago was due to what Diamond himself called a "package" of ecological circumstances and cultural inventions that worked together synergistically: domesticated, genetically altered plants and animals, draft animals, technologies for plowing, cutting, threshing, grinding, food transport and storage, cooking, processing hides and fibers, sewing, manufacturing tools of stone, bone, and wood, as well as access to reliable fresh water sources, abundant fuel, long-distance trade, and defense against raiders. As a result, ten to one hundred times more people can be fed from one acre than from hunting-gathering, and a settled lifestyle permitted a reduction of the spacing of births from a four year separation among nomads to two years, leading to rapid population growth.

Corning cites contemporary examples of synergistic cultural evolution involving the creation of new forms of collective action, together with new toolsets. The Igorot people of the remote mountains of Luzon, in the Philippines, use a vast, elaborate, intricately constructed combination of terraces, dams, canals, and ponds to grow rice sustainably and with remarkable efficiency. It was originally thought that the system was thousands of years old, but anthropologist Charles Drucker turned up evidence indicating that lowlanders who had practiced slash-and-burn agriculture for millennia were forced to migrate to the highlands when Spanish invaders seized choice lowlands. The sustainable high yields of Igorot rice farming depends on constant replenishment of soil nitrogen in places where there is not a natural abundant supply. The Igorot use ponds of blue-green algae that live in symbiosis with the rice plants, receiving carbon dioxide from the rice in exchange for fixing nitrogen. In order to use and maintain this new, complex technological and ecological system the former slash-and-burn lowlanders had to invent a new social and political system involving the disciplined coordination of many family groups.

The Great Basin Shoshone of North America, studied by Julian Steward in the 1930s, forage in very small family groups, with plants providing 80% of their calories. In winter, however, several families gather in larger camps near an abundant resource and trade information, teach each other skills, and find mates. During rabbit drives, groups of 75 or more coordinate efforts deploying nets hundreds of feet long. A division of labor is temporarily established between net holders and beaters, under the supervision of a temporary rabbit boss.

Work by Gintis, Bowles, Fehr and Gächter indicate that strong reciprocity among humans is egoistic, not altruistic or cooperative, and depends on aggressive punishment of cheaters. This is related to work by Boyd and Richerson on group-serving norms of "fairness." Corning notes: "…the principle of fairness came to play a central role in reconciling conflicting claims of self-interest within the groups/bands/tribes that were indisipensable to our ancestors' survival and reproductive success over many thousands of generations."

Evolutionary Economics: Metaphor or Unifying Paradigm?

One Sentence Summary:
Conventional economics cannot be simply augmented with biological or evolutionary metaphors; economic science must undergo a fundamental paradigm shift to recast the modern world in bioeconomic terms as a collective survival enterprise incorporating both cooperative and competitive strategies.
Disciplines:
Biology
Cultural Evolution
Economics
Findings:
  • Survival is still a problem in the post-war era, especially considering radical changes in the human biological and cultural environment (population growth, resource depletion, globalization trends, technological advances, etc..)
  • In bioeconomic struggles for survival and reproduction, neither competition nor cooperation is the sole organizing principle; both are contingent survival strategies within the larger process of adaptation.
  • Mutually beneficial relationships are common in nature as well as business, and as a species our capacity to cooperate and establish social organizations that promote these relationships may be our strongest survival strategy.
  • We can no longer expect that self-seeking rational agents will produce social order through the invisible hand of competitive markets, let alone optimal economic solutions.
  • Human inventiveness, creativity, cumulative learning, cultural values and rituals all play important interdependent roles in evolutionary change.
Keywords:
bioeconomy
competition
complexity
cooperation
cultural evolution
ecology
evolution
interdependence
Author(s) / Editor(s):
Published in:
The Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems, 18(4): 421-435
Date:
1996
One Paragraph Summary:

The human being is not unique among the animals in having to apply limited time and energy to strategies in order to survive and reproduce. Yet modern economic theory avoids biological or psychological justifications for behavior by treating individual humans as black boxes with simple input and output. This reductionist view of economic problems neglects universal bioeconomic principles that underlie all survival enterprises. Chaos theory and modeling of non-linear dynamical systems show that economic systems display historicity: path dependency and sensitivity to past cultural and economic development. Corning lists these universal principles: that the survival problem is always contingent on the specific environment, that energy and access to information about energy are crucial to survival and reproduction, that organisms have limited time and energy to meet their needs, that competitive and cooperative strategies are both equally relevant aspects of adaptation, and that dramatic economic benefits can arise from the non-linear cooperative effects of synergies. An analytical framework under the “Interactional Paradigm” would begin with the development of explicit measures of human needs satisfaction and a reexamination of the relationship between our biological, motivational substrate and our learned and cultural behaviors.

Darwin's Blind Spot: Evolution Beyond Natural Selection

One Sentence Summary:
Symbiosis, the "living together of differently named organisms" is far more important in the evolution of life and the functioning of organisms and ecologies than the competition-centric views of Darwin's early defenders asserted, and may be the key driving force in the evolution of life on earth.
Disciplines:
Biology
Findings:
  • Cooperative (symbiotic) arrangements are central to all life on earth, and were probably essential in driving evolution by rapidly producing useful mechanisms and speeding up genomic experimentation. The origin of DNA itself assumed cooperative interactions between replicating molecules.
  • Symbiosis includes predation and parasitism as well as mutualism - partnerships that involve tough bargains and hard compromises in which the continuing survival of participating organisms is at stake.
  • Every organism, from single celled creatures to humans and ecosystems, can be seen as superorganisms that result from the genomic federation of large numbers of independent or formerly independent life forms.
Keywords:
interdependence
evolution
ecology
cooperation
altruism
Author(s) / Editor(s):
Published in:
Houghton-Mifflin
Date:
2002
One Paragraph Summary:

In the early 1990s, Lynn Margulis demonstrated evidence that the essential energy-producing cellular organelles of mitochondria in animals and chloroplasts most probably originated as free-living bacteria that became incorporated into cells through a symbiotic union. Since then, the role of symbiosis as both a driver of evolutionary change and an essential element in the existence of the terrestrial ecosystem has challenged the view that competition and selection are the predominant driving forces of evolution. The exchange of genetic material among the earth's bacteria can be thought of as a global superorganism, humans can be thought of superorganisms that exist through the contributing processes of billions of symbiotic life forms, and life on earth, from the oxygenated atmosphere to the nitrogen-fixing bacteria that live in the fungus hosted by tree roots, can be seen as a complex system of interconnected symbiotic partners. Cooperative arrangements are central, not peripheral, in biological processes. Lovelock's Gaia Hypothesis goes as far as to assert that life regulates the geology and chemistry of the planet in order to make it hospitable to life.

One Page Summary:

Although competition for vital resources is indeed a part of every life-bearing environment, and the winnowing of competitors through natural selection is essential to the evolutionary process, cooperative symbiotic arrangements are not only essential, but appear to have been necessary for driving evolution at the pace it has unfolded on earth. The discovery that the energy-producing engines of plant and animal cells probably resulted from the union of formerly separate organisms places symbiosis at the center of life's origins, evolution, and continuation.

Nitrogen, for example, is a resource necessary for the growth of plant life, yet plants are not capable of producing it efficiently and independently, but plant life does not consist solely of those victorious competitors who manage to sequester sufficient supplies of this resource. The roots of many species of trees host fungi that in turn create hospitable environments for bacteria that are capable of fixing nitrogen in the soil in a form useful to the trees. The trees, fungi, and bacteria create environmental conditions, through their specialized capacities, that encourage one another's growth; instead of competing for a scarce resource, these different kinds of organisms work together to produce it in abundance. Similarly, every human carries twenty times as many living bacteria as human cells - 90% of the dry weight of human feces consists of the bodies of intestinal microbes. Humans and other animals are able to digest a wide variety of substances solely because we have evolved myriad symbiotic partnerships with a wide variety of microorganisms.

The capacity of different microorganisms to exchange and combine genetic material, from the useful emergence of mitochondria and chloroplast-bearing cells to the dangerous (to humans) endosymbiotic union of different animal forms of influenza strains, constitutes a vast and rapid engine for genetic change. Nobel winning evolutionary biologist Joshua Lederberg remarked in a 2002 lecture: "Together with its symbionts/parasites, we should think of each host as a superorganism with the respective genomes yoked into a chimera of sorts."
The way in which early life forms may have altered the chemical composition of the atmosphere, ocean, and earth's crust led James Lovelock to propose the Gaia Hypothesis - that life on earth is a vast and complex, self-regulating, superorganism, in which the separate parts cooperate in order to maintain an environment supportive of their existence and evolution.

Syndicate content